Identity: the need to belong

By nature, humans are social creatures with an innate need to belong. At what point did I as a human feel that I had a particular set identity? Did I choose it or was it imposed? Why did I hold onto it? How did it benefit me? And more importantly, was the identity I clung to innocent, or had I fallen into the trap – as so many of us have – of unassumingly donning a politicized identity that others had created?

I spent much of my life in an “identity crisis.” I was born in the United States; my father was a Pakistani doctor, my mother was a nurse. We moved to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia when I was small.

Around 6th grade I began to understand that although I called Saudi Arabia home, the Saudis themselves regarded me as an alien. Part of the reason it began to even matter to me that I should be Saudi, was because the nationality that I did have (American) I did not like.

My parents ensured my sister and I had a good Islamic education and upbringing. They were proud of us when we covered our hair to go to the Saudi Arabian International School in Riyadh. But ironically, although I lived in a country where covering head to toe was the law for women, within the confines of an American run institution I was mocked and humiliated for being different. Being called a “Paki” threw me into the world of colonized and colonizer.

This is when I realized that I was not allowed to be whomever I chose. I learned to fear. I became frustrated with my insecurities and determined I could never be an American. This made it all the more important that I consider myself a Saudi: it was the home I loved; the people were of a faith that I loved. But we did not receive Saudi nationality in spite of my father’s efforts. As I grew older I discovered how imperfect the country I called home was in its treatment of women and in its prejudices.

So there I was, not caring to be Pakistani (I took it for granted but it was not my home, and how could I belong to a land where people made fun of my accent?); neither did I want to be American. The only identity I wanted – Saudi – I was not allowed to have. So I went back to the U.S. for boarding school and was stuck with the label of “foreign student” for the next 8 years.

The one identity that I had complete liberty to choose and which gave me a sense of control was that of my faith. Islam was an identity no one could question. So in my second year at university I decided to wear the head scarf. I was determined to show my faithfulness to Islam and I wore my identity proudly.

But what gradually occurred to me was the respect and kindness I was receiving in the USA. Indeed, when I wore the scarf to college, my professors were even more kind and attentive. People asked me to share my faith with them. It was amazing. By the time I graduated I was proud to be an American Muslim.

In my recent self-searching, it occurred to me that when I had put the hijab on, I had not done so only from religious conviction. It was to take back control. If I wore the veil, then people's attention would focus on my religion and not my color and ethnicity.

In “Identity and Victimhood” the author Diane Enns asks: “…does the need to belong become an absolute and exclusionary need only when it is threatened by external forces, only when thorugh discriminatory pracitces one’s belonging suddenly becomes an act of resistance? Do we ask only how hatred has been made into a community but never how that community has been made out of hatred?”

Facing discrimination in my youth led me down a path I may not otherwise have chosen. If it were not for a boy who told me how stupid I looked with a scarf on my head, perhaps I would never have felt the urgency to wear it as soon as I got the courage. If it weren't for the fact that the Saudi government did not allow me to call that country my own, I may not have become so fierce in demonstrating my religious identity.

Although clinging to Islam was spiritual survival… wearing the hijab was at that time a form of resistance for me. The ultimate question I must ask myself regularly is: Am I playing the role of a victim in the world of politicized identities today, or am I taking the initiative to be who I want to be?

If it took me so long to get out from under the politicized identities imposed upon me, how much more difficult is it for those in conflict-ridden areas in the post-colonial and post-9/11 world to escape the labeling they encounter? Do we cling to our identities because there is a benign need to belong, or is it an act of resistance due to historical trauma and insecurity? For years it was comfortable for me to live within my shell of having only a Muslim identity. It was not until the Initiatives of Change Connecting Community Fellowship Program in the United States that I regained my sense of identity as a human and that I shared it with all of humanity.

What will my children go through when they are discriminated against for being Muslim, with relatives who are Shià (their father is Iranian) and of Pakistani heritage, and in my daughter's case, as a female? My hope is to instill in them that they must first and foremost identify with their Creator and then with all of humanity. Only after that must they consider their other identities as relevant to whoever they are.

Anjum Ashram Ali is the co-chair of Hope in the Cities

NOTE: Individuals of many cultures, nationalities, religions, and beliefs are actively involved with Initiatives of Change. These commentaries represent the views of the writer and not necessarily those of Initiatives of Change as a whole.

 

Identity: Freedom or Conformity

I was intrigued by Anjum Ahsraf Ali’s article ‘Identity: the need to belong’. Her opening line sharply focussed my own mind. I also questioned what belonging meant when attempting to establish my identity. Of course our initial identities are formed by families who teach us how to live and act in diverse communities throughout the world.

I was born and raised in the United States of America and brought up with an awareness of being a citizen of a country that upheld freedom and justice for all. My grandmother was particularly loving, gentle and caring of her four grandchildren, but I think I received special attention from her regarding school home work and religious education. I was taught about a kind and gentle man they said was the ‘only begotten Son of God’ We were taught to worship Jesus and to follow Him. I was baptised by full immersion at the age of eight. As experience of life increased with age I became aware of many contradictions. Not everyone was kind and gentle. Not everyone was allowed to express themselves or to pursue their dreams.

If I wanted to belong to a particular group within the wider community it was necessary to adhere to whatever belief system the group embraced. If I found that difficult then I could not belong. Eventually I discovered that, in order to belong anywhere, I would have to renounce my independence to think for myself, to reason, or to fairly consider other points of view. There was a subtle pressure to conform, politically, religiously, professionally or socially. I intuitively resisted joining any group because it excluded anyone who did not belong. That did not make sense.

I wanted freedom to be who I am. I did not want to conform to external pressures to be what someone else had in mind. I was tired of being told what and how to think, what to believe or how to live in a society that was created by others. But, dear Lord, who am I? Am I not the culmination of what ‘others’ instilled into my brain and mind from birth? Am I not a product of the society – the country – in which I was born and raised? Can I possibly be otherwise? Dear God, who am I?

At eighteen I enlisted for three years in the US Air Force. I was asked for details of my work experience (presumably to determine where I might be useful). To my surprise I had worked at nearly twenty different jobs. Unlike many people I could not identify myself by the work I did to earn a living. I came to England in 1956 to appear in a musical I was in on Broadway (another interesting job). I have lived here most of the time since. I was frequently asked why I preferred to live in England rather than sunny California. I never had a ready reply. One day I realized that, where I live is not as important as with whom I live. My identity is not tied to the person I married. It simply means that my home is where I live with the person I love.

My country is my birthplace, where my character, personality and ego were developed, but my country does not identity me anymore than my religious beliefs, profession, style of dress or physical image. Not long ago I had a discussion with a clergyman. He commented that I seemed to be a citizen of the world. Without thinking I replied, ‘No, I’m a citizen of the universe.’ We were both surprised. But the more I thought about it I realized how true the remark was. My atoms and molecules are similar to those found in the universe. They are simply arranged differently. Not as dense as a clump of coal or piece of granite (some might disagree). However, in common with all humans, I am self-aware and have the ability to reason. Powerful capabilities not shared by all living creatures. I might be persuaded to think of myself as being highly superior to all other life forms. That would quite wrong. Firstly I have no way of knowing the powers or limitations of other species in real terms. Secondly reason argues that an intelligence, beyond our comprehension, created the universe. If that is true then I am much more than the sum total of my complex material existence and I would not wish to limit self-identity to a short physical life span. As a citizen of the universe I fear nothing and hate no one (but, oh my, am I tested). I am one with everything and therefore would not wish to harm any part of myself.

I will welcome any comments from others.

Comment: Identity: Freedom or Conformity

I really liked this piece, it's an honest reflection and something I can really connect to. I come from a country and a society where hatered for other religions and other ways of life is a norm, in fact it is a part of the national identity. Like so many other countries in the world, my country and my people identify themselves by the enemy - the other if you like. Having seen and felt my universal exsistance I cannot agree with their point of view any more, so I am an align in my own land.

I particularly like your concept of a universal identity. I've been thinking about it myself. I don't think much of religion, other than being a means to spirituality, which I think is my main objective because it enables me to see the universe in a completely different light, a perspective that my mundain senses do not afford. I think about concisousness and its source. By qualification I am now a cognative scientist, but our understanding of consciousness is based on behaviour and adaptation. Since I think of consciousness as much more I feel there is an unquantifiable, spritual aspect which is also what unites me with the rest of the universe. Do you think the answer to the world's problem are in spirituality and removing identity from the self rather than defining identity?